A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

Well this is interesting. 


There are a couple of key pieces of legislation that have failed this last week.  It appears the extension to the Production Tax Credit is dead in Washington for 2014.  NA WINPOWER is reporting the extension is dead.  Partisan politics is blamed.  Spin blaming partisan politics is a bunch of corporate propaganda baloney bull.  The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) is such a strong lobbying organization, their influence reaches well beyond party lines. 


The problem for the AWEA remains. America’s support for subsidies for the wind industry has waned across party lines.  Americans has become exacerbated with the aggressive push by wind companies to site turbines everywhere in the Midwest.  Americans know there the propaganda behind “clean” energy is dirtier than what the industry likes to display.  While the wind industry’s lobbying efforts still garners much support, there is a clear trend of less support each year.   


Another key legislation died in Illinois this week.  According to Steve Daniels at Crane’s Chicago, the “fix” to the Illinois Renewable Portfolio Standard is dead.  The Illinois Wind Energy Association and its friends at the Environmental Law & Policy Center claim the fix died in Springfield because ComEd’s backed out of any support of a compromise with claims Exelon would be forced to shut down two or three nuclear reactors in Illinois. 


Again, when you let the wind industry spin their excuses for failure, when partisan politics can’t be blamed, a big ambiguous corporation will be the evil empire.  It’s surprising the wind industry doesn’t blame the ambiguous and mysterious Koch Brothers.  The billionaire brothers seemed to be blamed for anything else with the wind industry.  Then again, if you read between the lines in statements made at the AWEA WIND POWER2014 convention, the industry recognizes 2014 has been a rough year.


What the wind industry hates to admit is the Illinois Renewable Portfolio Standard “fix” will cost Illinois ratepayers more money.  With energy costs forecasted to rise dramatically this summer, in part due to paying for PJM  reserve capacity charges, legislatures really do not want to be blamed for further price increases.  So the bills sponsored by Senator Frerichs (candidate for State Treasure) and Representative Frank Mautino of Spring Valley looks to be dead for this year. 


Now the new term by the Illinois wind energy industry is “OVERHAUL” to replace “FIX”.  The Illinois Renewable Portfolio Standard should be called the WIND PORTFOLIO STANDARD.  As it reads 75% of the “clean” renewable energy is mandated to come from wind energy.  Solar has a far lower percentage and distributed generation with net metering (residential rooftop solar) is mandated to less than 0.05%. 


Seriously, the Illinois Renewable Portfolio Standard mandates less than half of one tenth of a percent of the energy comes from consumer based generation.  Who really wins from the RPS?  It isn’t the consumer.  Illinois ratepayers and even ComEd would be better off with a Renewable Portfolio Standard that mandated 4% Net Metering than one that mandates 20% wind energy.


Base load generation companies and the Illinois Solar Energy Association need to think about this.  Net Metering will not create the problems of negative pricing that are created by the Production Tax Credit and Renewable Portfolio Standards.  Net Metering is not the enemy of base load generation companies and the solar industry has nothing to gain when the RPS is weighted so heavily to the wind industry.


With 75% of the RPS being mandated to come from the wind industry, the RPS is a lobbyist created sweetheart deal for the wind industry.  It’s also Governor Quinn picking winners and losers with the wind industry lobbyists being the chosen “winner” and the ratepayers being the real losers.  


Do Illinois consumers really want Governor Quinn picking “winners” for them in the energy industry?


Ratepayers and consumers paying the wind industry through the Production Tax Credit and Renewable Portfolio standards is a big problem for the industry.  What was once governmental support for a tiny upstart industry has become subsidizing a fattened pig, but there is another problem with the PTC and RPS’s.


Michael Skelly of Clean Line Energy Partners LLC was the first to state it.  The low hanging fruit in the wind industry has been picked.  There are no more siting locations for wind farms without new transmission projects.  New transmission projects for the advancement of the wind energy industry means eminent domain.  With this, America has reached an ethical decision. 


Is it morally acceptable to use eminent domain to promote an industry that is heavily subsidized?


Yes eminent domain is not used to force siting of wind turbines. Many in the Midwest, people fail to see a difference to eminent domain to take land for wind turbine siting or taking land to site powerlines because there is no difference. 


There is a term used in the industry to classify certain costs.  “BUT FOR” costs are costs incurred by one company for an upstream project by another company.  For example, Rock Island Clean Line wants to put a transmission line from Northwest Spenser, Iowa to Channahon, Illinois.  ComEd argues there will be several switching, transmission, and substation improvements east of Channahon that ComEd with have to upgrade.  These upgrades will not be necessary BUT FOR RICL and therefore RICL should cover these costs.   


America has reached the point where transmission upgrades are needed but for the advancement of the wind industry through the Production Tax Credit and Renewable Portfolio Standards.  Without the PTC and RPS’s, there would be no need for transmission projects like the Northern Pass project through New England, Plains & Eastern through Arkansas or the Grain Belt Express through Kansas and Missouri. 


These proposed transmission projects would not exist but for government projects to promote industries definition of “clean” energy.  Unfortunately to federal or state governments have no interest in compensating farmers and rural landowners for these perpetuity easements.  


Is it morally just to abuse eminent domain laws for transmission projects that would not be considered but for the Production Tax Credit and Renewable Portfolio Standards?  The answer is obvious to a sane, reasonable, and practical person.  Too bad sanity, reasonability, and practicality can sometimes be uncommon in capital legislatures.


This week morals, ethics sanity, reasonability, and practicality have won in Washington D.C. and Springfield, Illinois.  The PTC doesn’t get extended and the RPS does not get “fixed”.  This is bigger than one transmission project.  This is a fight for the basic freedoms and principals that make the foundation of America.  This battle is the new frontline of America’s energy war.

1480 Views Comments 0 Comments Comments Add Comment Author BioAuthor Bio
ReportReport This Post as Foul/Inappropriate

  The 8th Annual Public Participation for Transmission Siting.     Clean Line is hosting another EUCI conference in January. Keryn at STOPPATHW...

This energy world is a strange and bizarre one.  Even after a year of learning what goes on, sometimes I still don’t get the logic of it.  Maybe this is just a classic example of &l...

Every now and then someone writes something and puts it on the internet that is truly extraordinary and a piece of work.  If newspapers still did the research like Keryn and STOPPATHWV and wro...

Originality is the art of concealing your source.     There is no attempt to hide the source of this Letter to the Editor.     This letter has been sha...

Clean Line Energy, Vulture Capital, and Venture Politics     A mere forty years ago, beach volleyball was just a beginning.  No bureaucrat would have invented it, a...

Part 1:    Wind Needs 20 year Power Purchasing Agreements I love it when the wind lobbyist and those that jump on their coat tails make contrasting arguments.  The wind indu...

PTL! Hallelujah! Amen. Somebody get me a hanky to wave cause that’s some mighty fine preachin!   If you have an account to the Wall Street Journal, check out yesterday’s ed...

Thank you NARUC!    There's somebody that represents the consumer, ratepayer, landowner, and public. They just put out a press release opposion federal tranmission siting...

There seems to be a notion that the only wind energy in in the Midwest and unless we build more powerlines to New England and the southeast, Midwesterners are being selfish and not sharing like we...

PJM Cartel Exposed Again – The Atlantic Wind Connection Fights for its Life at FERC   http://calhounpowerline.com/2013/01/17/pjm-cartel-exposed-again-the-atlantic-wind-conne...

This is a great read about how legislation is created at the state level through bill mills.  I highly encourage reading this blog on the Council of State Governments.  Their idea of Tran...

“If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.”  --Douglas Ad...

I just started understanding who FERC truly is and what goes on there.  Keryn Newman at StopPATHWV and her previous postings were a big big help.  She recently wrote another Blog about FE...

My first reaction to Grid2030 the assumption Jimmy Glotfelty was rather arrogant in his failure to recognize ratepayers and landowners, but I am beginning to realize it is a large portion of th...

Somebody in recent Northern Illinois Letter to Editor’s War with RICL once said “We can’t have it both ways”.  This is exactly what RICL needs to be told.  You can...

Frequently over the internet, Jimmy Glotfelty claims to be a “Roosevelt Republican”.  This is an interesting comparison considering Franklin D.  Roosevelt would call him somet...

Every now and then something is written on the internet.  Sometime later the author comes back and reads it.  The question is then asked “Did I write that?”  The relevanc...

RICL claims every project by Clean Line Energy project will employee 5,000 people.  I'm no economist, but doing the math that adds up to 20,000 construction jobs!   That is a ver...

Supoose  energy enters Illinois and the PJM market from the  MISO region and the Illinois consumers do not need the energy or use the energy.  The electricity travels east to the New...


Blog Editor
Recent EntriesRecent Entries
Recent CommentsRecent Comments


Defining the Value of the Grid

Apr 29, 2015 - 2015-01-01 14:00:00

Improving Strategic Planning in The Energy Industry

May 20, 2015 - 2015-01-01 12:00:00

Evolving Beyond AMI to the Utility/Customer Nexus

Apr 30, 2015 - 2015-01-01 12:00:00

Conferences / Shows

AESP Spring Conference

May 19, 2015 - May 21, 2015

Energy Central's SmartCities

May 12, 2015 - May 13, 2015

CS Week 2015 & Conference 39

Apr 27, 2015 - May 01, 2015

Utility Demand Response & Energy Efficiency

May 13, 2015 - May 14, 2015

Utility Integrated Resource Planning

May 13, 2015 - May 14, 2015

Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2015 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.