There are "8 possible End-State, only one of which is the generic market model paradigm: retail competition with active demand and ultraquality transportation. That is the essence." This is a historic document, posted on July 7th, 2007, both under the EnergyPulse.net reference and on the BMH Blog as Synthesis Proposal Agreement of EWPC .

Reference: All Monopoly Markets created by Regulation Are a Risk.

To all readers,

A minimal agreement proposal under the generative dialogue that avoids monopoly markets on wholesale and retail, open to be enhanced, is as follows:

Slides 7 to 13 of the CMU presentation present 8 possible End-State, only one of which is the generic market model paradigm: retail competition with active demand and ultraquality transportation. That is the essence.

To take the best development path, including necessary transitions, to the End-State means eliminating "native load," and energy only markets at the outset, to avoid costly intermediate transitions. Those two eliminations are a prerequisite to an effective system, with wholesale and retail competition demand integration, and transportation reintegration.

There are key elements that will require standards to complete the detailed cooperation on market vs. market competition, hopefully under global institutions. However, most technological and business solutions belong to the company vs. company competition.

In summary, a general agreement is that we should do without regulated price controls on the retail and wholesale markets (that is how the EWPC paradigm came to being on EnergyPulse with the intention to replace the faulty deregulation paradigm). I suggest that regulators worldwide should shift from price regulation to prudential regulation, under a global institution.