A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

A few weeks ago, my colleagues and I, power market consultants at Webb, Scott & Quinn, scanned back at some old PJM forwards and compared them to current forwards...noting that there was a major drop in PJM prices.  I promised to come back with more detail, including a breakdown of peak and off-peak prices as well as a view of impied heat rates and spark spreads.  So here goes!

We looked at forwards for June 2009 delivery, as traded in April 2008 and February 2009.  We also looked at corresponding gas prices for Columbia-Appalachia.  Here's what we found:

Gas and peak power prices tracked downward together, falling by 55% and 57% respectively.  OK.  Implied heat rate dopped by about 4%, very consistent.

The major difference between the two periods, of course, was spark spread, the real measure of marginal profitability, and it's not good for merchant generators.  Spark spreads for units in the 7000-9000 Btu/kWh heat rate range drop by about 60%.  For example, an 8000 heat rate unit would see its margin drop from $38.44/MWh to $15.00, based on these forwards.  Of course, these are just based on forwards, and just for PJM.  But they are reflective of all U.S. power markets, at least directionally.

The implications for power plant valuation are pretty obvious.  Gas-fired plants face a bleaker outlook on operating profit and hence cash flow.  Likewise, coal plants lose value, but are still more profitable/valuable on a go-forward basis...sure the so-called "dark spread" takes a huge hit, but the spreads are still a great deal higher than those of their corresponding gas competitors.

 

Jim Letzelter

Jim is an energy consultant at Webb, Scott & Quinn.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Admin note: Links to pages provided by Albany Website Design.  The above content is the author's work and does not necessarily reflect the beliefs of Albany Website Design or Tech Valley Webs.

3436 Views Comments 3 Comments Comments Add Comment Author BioAuthor Bio
ReportReport This Post as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Great piece! Thanks!

The most disquieting piece here is that the market's implied heat rate stayed more or less constant while natgas prices halved. Normally, implied heat rates rise somewhat as natgas prices fall (and vice versa) so as to maintain the spark spread (or at least some of it). That has not happened this time. What's worse, our analysis of DA on peak power prices for June 2009 PJM Western Hub as of Feb 24th shows $46.20, which is $4-5 less than the forward curve.

James Carson, JBCarson@RisQuant.com
# Posted By James Carson | 2/26/09 4:21 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Thanks Jim!

Took a while for me to get my followup post up...but I finally found some data.

Interesting about the June 2009 prices in your analysis. Sounds like a trading opportunity if I ever heard one...

Jim
# Posted By James Letzelter | 2/26/09 7:59 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo June PJM-WH is normally a good short. It can also be very dangerous. (Yes, I caught the wry humor in your response.) In model integrity backtesting, for June 2008 our models shot $5 too high and in 2007 $5 too low. 2006 was $1 low. In my experience, summer months for PJM-WH generally trades very near value for an outright combined with a deep out of the money daily exercise call.

Generally, PJM-WH is the best arbitraged power market, even if substantial trading opportunities persist. That's not surprising since 60% of the forward trading is done there. Amazingly, at the ISO level, DayAhead versus RealTime arbitrages have persisted for years in many if not most markets. I should post an article about that.
# Posted By James Carson | 2/27/09 10:44 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox

Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent EntriesRecent Entries
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2012 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.