|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 1996-2012 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated. CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central. 2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014 Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good post as usual. Is the U.S. planning to export its energy policy to developing countries?
Can you tell me why the political energy policy process in the U.S. is leading to a DOE mandated standards architecture, which has a huge flaw that originated in EPAct 92? The flaw is based on the policy economic first, system performance second.
As you can see from the example on the post "The Deadly Sin of State Regulators on the Smart Grid (http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2009/7/5... )," the risk involved with the Smart Grid is completely unacceptable. The post "Strong & Smart Grid (http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2009/7/2... )," describes very well what is needed by the U.S. and developing countries.
Given the above, Why the U.S. is not letting go the Investor Owned Utilities Architecture Framework to follow the advice in the article "How Secretary Chu can Deliver a Win-Win, Big Deal Outcome at the Global Sustainability Game (http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2009/7/1... )."?