A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

The rancor permeating Washington is getting to me. While the loyal opposition is encouraged to vigorously present its ideas, it is not supposed to vilify and continually obstruct the party in power.

This is not a political statement. It's a civics statement. Compromise is the art of politics. But as the parties are being pulled to their respective fringes, governance has become a nightmare and average people are feeling alienated.

Witness lately what has happened with the health care bill. Certainly, no one is satisfied with how their premiums keep going up while the benefits are always being cut. So, there must be some things that the two sides can do together? But the more vitriol that is spewed, the less likely it is that anything positive can occur.

It's also counterproductive for the party out of power. Do the Republicans, for example, think they can win with only their Tea Party activists? Or do you think it more reasonable that they try to appeal to moderates who make up the majority of the electorate? Their lawmakers need to act like statesmen and stateswomen, standing up for their causes without using the kind of disturbing language that leads to illicit acts.

It's not just the right wing fringe that does this. It's also the radical left. If their mutual goals are to destroy each other then it should not be a mystery why the typical American holds their elected representation in such disrepute. The system, no doubt, works more efficiently when party leaders cross the aisle and craft the solutions necessary to address society's ills.

The backlash from the health care debate is starting to have some resonance. Members of the two parties, for instance, are at least talking in earnest with respect to a banking bill or an energy bill that would take a more modest approach to curbing carbon emissions.

Believe me, I understand the strong sentiments on all sides of these issues – and have the reader responses to show for it. But it's not about winning at all costs. It's about generating rules and regulations that are workable and ones in which all sides can stake a claim. Americans will then take more pride in their system of government. ###

Follow Ken on Twitter at www.twitter.com/freehand1200

member photo Careful there, Ken, your true colors are starting to show. Did you write a similar blog or column a couple of years ago when it was the Democrats villifying the Republicans? I suspect not, and I don't remember seeing one. Also, you falsely put the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) folks into the Republican party when they are from all political persuasions. A majority of them could be considered conservative. By that I mean that they want a fiscally conservative federal government, and one that might endeavor to at least try and maintain some constitutional principals. In case you haven't noticed, this country is basically bankrupt and can't afford any new entitlement programs.

The health care bill recently jammed down our throats is nothing but a huge power grab by the federal government. It is painfully obvious to anyone who looks at it and the way in which it was passed. By the way, what "crisis" has been solved by this monstrosity? I see many new taxes, regulations, IRS agents, etc., but nothing that looks remotely like a true solution to any problem. Tort reform? Not in there.

H. L. Mencken once said "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populous alarmed -- and hence clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."

That probably explains the global warming scare as well.
# Posted By Darby Hanson | 3/30/10 5:07 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo I don't recall you saying this when the Republicans were in charge.
# Posted By James Carson | 4/1/10 10:26 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo I guess I have a few points to make:
1) Carbon Capture and Sequestration, which the Obama administration is pursuing by hook or by crook, is a destructive, wasteful, and very expensive technology which will increase global warming rather than decrease it while simultaneously depleting oxygen in the atmosphere. It is being pursued in the face of overwhelming evidence that the science supporting manmade CO2 as the principal cause of global warming has been compromised by dishonest science. Trying to foist a technology on the country's electricity consumers which will double their electrical bills while further decimating manufacturing, and therefore jobs, is not good governance. CCS is a very dumb path to follow.

2) Based on President Obama's past history of false promises and radical agendas, one would be wise to look at his call for opening up exploration with a healthy amount of distrust.

3) To imply that drilling offshore of Florida will negatively impact their tourist industry is a false implication. Offshore rigs will be well off the coast and they do not seem to impact beachgoers in Galveston, Padre Island, and South Padre Island in Texas. The rigs offshore of Texas and Louisiana have actually improved the sport fishing industry there.
# Posted By Mark Wooldridge | 4/21/10 7:36 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Everyone's sick and tired of obstruction in Washington. The people voted for Obama because he promised changes in energy policy, education and healthcare. The Republicans are arrogant and presumptuous, and I'd say the same if it were Democrats opposing everything. We want change, we need change and we're going to get change, whether or not the Republicans come along for the ride. They're stodgy, reactionary and resistant to anything that makes logical good sense for this country, and they should take a look around at the rest of the developed world to see what's going on - or we'll keep missing the boat to remain competitive, thanks to their reactionary views. If I hear one more Rightwing politician claim to be speaking for "The American People" again I will scream. Most of the American People are centrist, and do not espouse the extremely conservative old-school 1990s ways that Reagan ushered in during the 1980s. We're in the 21st Century now - and the population of the US is evolving - we are also evolving in our thinking. Get with the program or hold this country back... that's the choice. I vote for change.
# Posted By Stephanie Nelson | 6/16/10 9:04 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox
Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent EntriesRecent Entries
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network

Conferences / Shows

GridWeek

Oct 18, 2010 - Oct 21, 2010

Autovation 2010

Sep 12, 2010 - Sep 15, 2010

GridWise Global Forum

Sep 21, 2010 - Sep 23, 2010

2010 Itron Users' Conference

Oct 17, 2010 - Oct 19, 2010


Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2010 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.