Energy Central Sponsors
A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

Well, if you are asking who it SHOULD BE, cast our vote for John Rowe.

As explained in our editorial in our current issue of EnergyBiz, he has a unique grasp of where the power industry has been, where it may be headed - and where it should be headed. In a rountdtable discussion with the magazine early in the summer, Rowe commented on a host of issues awaiting action by the next administraiton and Congress.

  "If the next administration tries to make all these decisions in the most politically correct fashion, then Ithink we’re looking at 30 to 40 cents electricity and very radical structural changes."e continues: "Neither party has got its act together on how to combine environmental policy and energy policy."He said, "… there’s a real dichotomy between advocating what we think is good for America, which we all try to do in our own halting ways, and doing what we must do for our shareholders. That kind of continues to haunt this industry as it always has."

I like that candor. It is a longshot that any new president would tap a utility executive for energy secretary, no matter how wise the choice. Responses would probably, predictably, run along the lines of inserting a fox into a hen house.

Who is likely to get the nod? I mulled the question over with some energy types in Washington last week when I was in town for GridWeek. Obviously, they prefer to remain anonymous.

Some names mentioned included:

Betsy Moler, Exelon exectutive and former chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, who has been described as a free-market Democrat.

Mike Bloomberg, New York City mayor, who has lately taken some interesting stands calling for a push to make Gotham a model city for renewables among the largest cities in the world. Discount Mayor Mike, though, because he is now making moves to run for a third term as mayor next year.

Rep. Heather Wilson, who lost her primary race in New Mexico, is considered a possible McCain pick if the Arizonan likes the idea of giving the energy portfolio to a fellow Southwesterner.

Whoever gets the nod, the job could well take on unprecedented importance if Barack or John want to make national energy policy a BRIDGE TO SOMEWHERE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"If the next president sets a course that deals with climate and energy supply issues in a decisive way, most of the country can have 15 to 20 cents per kilowatt-hour electricity and continue to have a high degree of reliability," Rowe said. "

member photo How does John Rowe himself feel about this possibility?
# Posted By Alan Belcher | 10/3/08 7:20 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo By reading "Our Take" and "View from the Bridge," It is wise to "agree that we have lost our way," to allow the new "course that deals with climate and energy supply" and demand "issues in a decisive way" to emerge. This begs the question of leadership.

As the case of the mainframe versus PCs of the computer industry can attest, John Rowe misunderstanding of the non-trivial aspects of the power industry is based on his flawed statement that confuses the properties of the system (afordable high reliability electricity) from the properties of one of the (unreliable) parts, when he said "Are we going to be in an era when politics written with a Capital 'P' continues to make it so difficult to accomplish those large projects that we become dependent on smaller technologies, even though the smaller ones are more expensive?

The proper mix of large and smaller technologies should not be the result of Capital 'P' regulation biased to large projects. We need to let the market decide, and that can be enabled with a decisive action that allows the new course to emerge.

The action should be based on a neutral environment as explained in the EWPC article Leadership Answers What to do First (please hit the link http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2008/4/1... ), whose summary states: "The answer to the question of what to do first is for the global power industry to get out of the wrong jungle to produce a EWPC based EPAct as soon as possible. That is the kind of leadership needed to face the inevitable fundamental changes required to significantly reduce today's legislative and regulatory uncertainty."

Hence EWPC is what the next energy secretary needs. Please take also a look at the article "EWPC Blog's First Year Anniversary: Electricity for the Digital Era" in the link http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2008/9/8...
# Posted By Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio | 10/3/08 11:09 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Marty,

The above post has evolved into the EWPC article <a title="Go To Blog Entry: The Next Energy Secretary" href="http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2008/10/..."><span style="color:#ff0000;">The Next Energy Secretary</span></a>, whose summary states "The insights to enable the next energy secretary succeed are laid in black and white."

Thank you,

José Antonio
# Posted By Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio | 10/3/08 7:16 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Forget above.

Marty,

The above post has evolved into the EWPC article "The Next Energy Secretary (please hit the link http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2008/10/... )," whose summary states "The insights to enable the next energy secretary succeed are laid in black and white."

Thank you,

José Antonio
# Posted By Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio | 10/3/08 7:19 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo There should not be a "next" Secretary of Energy; Samuel Bodman is the best man for the job. If Sam had not been constrained by the flawed policies of the current administration, he would most certainly would have made great progress in removing our grid and power infrastructure from the mess that Spencer Abraham and Bush/Enron plunged us into. Doctor Bodman, unlike the rest of us posting on this blog, is a true genius, and our last hope for rescuing this country from an otherwise inevitible energy catastrophe.
# Posted By William Norquay | 10/7/08 3:12 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo William,

I am glad that Sam Bodman is able to satisfy the EWPC article "U.S. Presidential Elections and the Need for a Global Energy Deal (please hit the link http://www.energyblogs.com/ewpc/index.cfm/2008/10/... ), whose summary says "The new president of the United States needs an Energy Secretary of high caliber that knows what he is talking about."
# Posted By Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio | 10/11/08 6:50 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox
Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Copyright © 1996-2008 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.