A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

I realize that some global warming skeptics - the few still out there - may think the NY Times is the devil's daily.

But for those of you who still have a firm grasp on reality and respect the Times as one of the best sources of information in this fast-changing world, you should know about a story from this morning's front page. The headline: "ON CLIMATE ISSUE, INDUSTRY IGNORED ITS SCIENTISTS.'

Apparently those coal and oil companies that argued for a decade that it could not be proved that human created heat-trapping gases were contributing to global warming should have known better. A document filed in a federal suit now shows the fossil fuel big boys were told by their own scientists "that the science backing the role of greenhouse gases in global warming could not be refuted," the Times reports.

An internal report prepared for the greenhouse gas naysayers stated, according to the Times, "The scientific basis for the greenhouse effect and the potential impact of human emissions of grennhouse gases such as CO2 on climate is well established and cannot be denied."

Well, the deniers denied the advice of their own deniers, because it was in their corporate interests to cast doubt and slow development of policies to combat global warming - even if they could never prevail in open scientific debate.Some, like ExxonMobil, have seen the light and have stopped financing such efforts, the Times reports.

Suppression of truth is always a nasty business. This year we celebrate the 400th anniversary of Galileo's first use of the telescope to look into space. With that gaze, many hold, modern science was born. For that revolution, and the notion that the earth was not the center of creation, the Roman Inquisition condemned Galileo to a long period of house arrest.

As the truth now ebbs out, it is increasingly evident that global warming naysayers have borrowed from the debate tactics of the tobacco companies that long maintained a dubious smokescreen, arguing there was no definitive proof that smoking causes cancer.

Truth ultimately prevails. Happy anniversary, Galileo.

 

409 Views Comments 2 Comments Comments Add Comment Author BioAuthor Bio
ReportReport This Post as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Sir,

Global warming is not to be denied it is to be recognized. Please read following:

From a century ago we people ignite the power of electricity using Hydro Power Plants, Thermal Power Plants and Nuclear Power Plants and then we distribute this good as alternative current via the grid.

Nowadays there is a change, we start implementing renewable sources of energy as wind, solar, biomass and others which is great.

A matter of fact is that since 1950 the increase of Worldwide Power industry is impressive. A short overlook on total of produced electricity and on a total increase of thermal energy excess inside Earth crust shows that they are quite equal.
The link between those two facts might be alternative character of electrical power causing induction heating of Earth crust.

Shall we discuss the topic anymore I don't know but it seems like we are building up on Titanic.

Here are the links in support of above exposed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Structure_of_the_magnetosphere_mod.svg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Earth-crust-cutaway-english.svg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_generator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_Induction_Law
http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/un/syreng/spm.pdf
http://meteora.ucsd.edu/~pierce/acpi/page03.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_heating
# Posted By Chavdar Azarov | 4/24/09 1:03 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Marty, Your comparison of 'global warming naysayers' and industry leaders to the tobacco industry is odious. Why do you feel it necessary to suppress debate about this vital issue? Contrary to your assertions, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of climate professionals who disagree with the so-called consensus. While I have not yet made up my mind on the subject, I see the weight of the evidence to be on the side of the naysayers. Why? The global warming models fail to predict what they must if they are correct. You really should educate yourself about the other side of the debate before you post something this ridiculous.
# Posted By James Carson | 4/26/09 12:30 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox

Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2012 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.