A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

Heard about the Haynesville Shale?

It's a newly discovered patch of Louisiana loam that could harbor 200 trillion - with a "t" - cubic feet of natural gas, reports the Wall Street Journal.

That coupled with other recent finds boost expert estimates of home-grown natural gas energy supplies equal to a century of demand.

You have to be a real sleuth - and persistent reader - to get to the kicker near the end of the long story. "Gas is now cheaper than coal in many parts of the country, leading utilites to burn more gas." The next sentence recounts the fact, known to many industry watchers, that of the 372 power plants planned in the next three years, 206 will burn coal and a mere 31 will combust coal.

Economics can be slippery. And what is cheap today may not be tomorrow. That goes for fuels. Natural gas is abundant and cheap today as a result of a two-year drilling spurt that boost production 11 percent. In that time, you no doubt recall, we had astronomical rises in fossil fuel prices. That was an incentive to hunt for oil and gas.

The timing of all this will have consequences, as Congress takes up proposals to put a price on greenhouse gas emissions as a means of throttling them back down.

Translation. Coal prices may be headed north - well north of the melting ice caps, while a supply glut will moderate natural gas prices as far as the eye can see.

We are the Saudi Arabia of coal, it has long been noted. We also have a kingdom of natural gas. Natural gas emits half the CO2 of coal, while coal currently is used to  produce more than twice as much electricity as natural gas. Regardless of where you stand on global warming, economics - at least for today - is swinging the needle away from coal and toward natural gas. 

 

637 Views Comments 2 Comments Comments Add Comment Author BioAuthor Bio
ReportReport This Post as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo The folks on the hill simply must get real with egineering principals and use that data to base the future energy programs of this country. I definitely agree, wind will never replace coal or natura gas or nuclear for resons stated. If The congress does not check on results from Europe on wind projects impemented there, then we are simply re-inventing the wheel and will make as much progress in our overall enegy stategy to become energy independent as we have since Jimmy Carter formed the Department of Energy to solve the problen once and for all.
# Posted By Michael Edwards | 5/1/09 11:06 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo << "Gas is now cheaper than coal in many parts of the country, leading utilites to burn more gas." >>

Where? I know of no regions, never mind "many", where gas is cheaper than coal, or even close.

James Carson, JBCarson@RisQuant.com http://www.RisQuant.com
# Posted By James Carson | 5/6/09 12:39 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox

Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2012 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.