A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

It seems half a loaf is what Team Obama wants to now settle for instead of a whole.

News reports surfaced yesterday saying the administration will press forward on a carbon cap on just the utility sector, which is responsible for one-third to 40 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, depending on who is doing the counting.

The rest of the economy will be excluded from the cap. I wonder if some of the ads I have been seeing on TV in recent evenings - against enacting new "energy taxes" and sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute - is having an impact.

The problem with focusing on "just" utilities is that Obama may be losing some Democratic Senate votes from coal producing states. Who says that there is a good chance the entire effort at carbon cap will fizzle in the fall as every mouse in Congress scammers to find his or her re-election cheese?

Meanwhile, Obama is finding new merit in suggestions by T. Boone Pickens - who captivated a recent EnergyBiz Leadership Forum - the pied piper of natural gas powered transport.

Heck of a way to run a country.

 

 

member photo after seeing the documentary on natural gas called Gasland , I know believe gas is not a good alternative.

http://www.sunrisesolarnow.com
# Posted By Tom Lyons | 7/16/10 11:50 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Mr. Lyons,

Natural gas as a good alternative is one of those "yes and no" answers. The newest generation of natural gas fired combined cycle powerplants are almost 50% more efficient than the newest generation of coal fired powerplants and part of the heat comes from combusting the hydrogen in the gas. This means a significant reduction in the amount of CO2/MWH produced.

Natural gas fueled vehicles can have engines designed to run with significantly higher compression, and therefore more efficiency, than gasoline fueled engines.

But, there is still CO2 being produced. At the same time, CO2 is not completely a bad thing--just ask a tree or the grass.
# Posted By Mark Wooldridge | 7/19/10 12:04 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Mark , I have no arguemnt once natural gas is out of the ground it has some great benifits, but if we have to contaminate the drinking water supply to get it out of the ground we gain nothing !

Watch the movie gasland for yourself , see how a whole community in Colorado has there drinking water now flamable !
# Posted By Tom Lyons | 7/20/10 9:31 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Cabot Oil & Gas and similar companies are giving hydraulic fracturing (fracking) a black eye by subcontracting the process out to the lowest bidder, and creating environmental mishaps by their sheer incompetence. Natural gas is vital to our energy future; now, if we can just get all the NIMBY types to allow 2 stage co-gens in their back yard...
# Posted By William Norquay | 7/20/10 4:34 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox
Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent EntriesRecent Entries
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network

Conferences / Shows

GridWeek

Oct 18, 2010 - Oct 21, 2010

Autovation 2010

Sep 12, 2010 - Sep 15, 2010

GridWise Global Forum

Sep 21, 2010 - Sep 23, 2010

2010 Itron Users' Conference

Oct 17, 2010 - Oct 19, 2010


Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2010 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.