A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

Reading the future of the energy sector is far from easy. And the consequence of reading the future is large. It could make the difference between vast profits – or losses, good policies - or bad.

Here are a few of the tidbits I have noticed in recent days that had me rubbing my chin. See if they add up to a complete picture for you.

Coal company stocks have fallen a shocking 57 percent in the last year – and the stocks are down 16 percent from the beginning of this year.

Natural gas prices may be low – but that is far from a turn off to commodity investors.  Trading in natural gas futures is up 30 percent in the first quarter of this year.

GE’s energy business is one of its strongest. Its energy infrastructure unit saw profits increase 10 percent to $1.5 billion and revenue jump 18 percent in the first quarter. 

Last week I had a fascinating conversation with three leading utility CFOs about the business of energy.  You can listen in by clicking here. Caroline Dorsa, of PSE&G in New Jersey, told us that power demand at her company is going to grow a scant 1 percent a year over the next decade. Yet the company is slated to invest $6.7 billion in its enterprise in just the next three years, with half of it going to transmission investments and the pursuit of greater power reliability.

You add it all up. While the direction we are headed in may not be clear – and there may not be a unified national energy policy driving us there – one thing is certain.

Enormous financial churn in the electricity business is accelerating and it will utterly transform the vast industry that lies just beyond the nearest light switch.   

2722 Views Comments 2 Comments Comments Add Comment Author BioAuthor Bio
ReportReport This Post as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Energy storage, smart grid, transmission infrastructure and renewables appear, at this point in history, to be little more than tools for wrenching substantial public money from the government. At least that's the picture one gets from a recent letter Glen Schleede wrote to his Senator Mark Warner, pointing out that DOE and its predecessors spent over $148 billion in the period 1973-2010 on energy R&D but has not a single significant commercially viable energy technology to show for it. If as Mr. Rosenberg learned New Jersey energy needs will not grow for a decade, it seems we face much less than an energy crisis. In the absence of a compelling reason for government intervention, why not let the market work for the next decade?
# Posted By Gary Abraham | 6/13/12 10:11 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Well the direction may not be clear in the near future, but we know all these sectors will boom in the
future with maybe coal being the exception.

http://www.energyoutletnow.com

http://www.reflectgreen.com
# Posted By Tom Lyons | 7/23/12 12:47 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox

Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2013 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.