A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

Smart metering took a one-two punch this week, one blow on each side of the country.
 

First, Baltimore Gas and Electric (BGE) was told by the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) that its application to deploy smart meters to its 1.2 million customers was being denied. “In this Order,” PSC commissioners wrote, “we deny Baltimore Gas and Electric Company’s Application for Authorization to Deploy a Smart Grid Initiative and to Establish a Surcharge Mechanism for the Recovery of Costs (the ‘Proposal’). Although we share BGE’s (and others’) hopes, and even enthusiasm, for the long-run potential and importance of the infrastructure upgrades known colloquially as the ‘smart grid,’ we find the business case for this Proposal untenable.

“The Proposal asks BGE’s ratepayers to take significant financial and technological risks and adapt to categorical changes in rate design, all in exchange for savings that are largely indirect, highly contingent and a long way off. We are not persuaded that this bargain is cost-effective or serves the public interest, at least not in its current form. But we invite BGE to revisit its Proposal in light of this Order and to submit an alternative that addresses the issues we discuss below.”
 

The proposal was initially filed with the PSC on July 13, 2009. In October 2009, the U.S. Department of Energy awarded BGE a $200 million Smart Grid Investment Grant for the nearly $452 million project. BGE had planned to deploy a smart meter network and advanced customer control system that would enable dynamic electricity pricing for its entire customer base. It also planned to expand the utility’s direct load control program to enhance grid reliability and improve congestion.

BGE officials were clearly flummoxed by the decision. A statement issued by the utility on June 21 said: "BGE is deeply disappointed, frustrated, and frankly surprised by the Maryland Public Service Commission's (PSC) decision to deny our application to deploy advanced energy meters to each of our 1.2 million customers and save them $2.6 billion."

The company noted the Obama Administration's wholehearted endorsement of BGE's initiative (as evidenced by the $200 million smart grid grant it awarded the utility), and added, "We're shocked that the PSC is jeopardizing the $200 million stimulus grant awarded by the Department of Energy to help pay for the initiative. The decision also jeopardizes Maryland's ability to meet the O'Malley Administration's energy efficiency goals under EmPOWER Maryland."

Whether BGE feels it can revamp its proposal for resubmission to the PSC is still unknown. The fate of the $200 million DOE grant it received is also unknown, though Matt Rogers, senior advisor to the U.S. secretary of energy for Recovery Act implementation, has said in a statement issued earlier this week that DOE officials plan to work with BGE to move forward.
 
Closely on the heels of the Maryland PSC’s decision, news came that San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera late last week filed a formal petition with the California Public Utilities Commission asking it to stop Pacific Gas & Electric Co. from continuing to install its smart meters pending completion of an official inquiry into the meters’ accuracy. (The PUC’s inquiry is expected to be completed later this summer.)
 
This is but the latest salvo in the pushback PG&E is experiencing this year, about two-thirds of the way through its installation of gas and electric smart meters across its California territory, which it began in 2006.
 
And PG&E is not alone. In Texas, Oncor is experiencing similar pushback by consumers.

Clearly, the consumer education piece of the smart grid equation needs revisiting.

I look forward to your comments here, or via e-mail at krowland@energycentral.com. Follow me on Twitter:  www.twitter.com/katerowland2

 
 

This morning, I posted an article in Intelligent Utility Daily about an intriguing plenary session I attended late last month at ConnectivityWeek in San Jose. Session moderator and Innovari Ener...

It's not often, in this blog, that I reach across the court, so to speak, to talk about environmentalism. But in this case, I had to share. Today's news brought with it word that actor/fishing...

Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers doesn’t mince words. At last week’s Smart Grid Roadshow in Cincinnati, Rogers gave the opening keynote, “Smart Grid: The Catalyst to Transform the Energy...

President Obama made a visit to Home Depot in Alexandria, Virginia, yesterday to talk about weatherization. "I know the idea may not be very glamorous, although I get really excited about it. He...

In my last post, I discussed why venture capitalist Steve Westly says he’s so bullish on the smart grid space.   Another speaker at the same conference was not so bullish, though he stopp...

Back before Secretary Chu delivered an early, 32-course Thanksgiving feast of smart grid demonstration grants, I had promised readers I would connect the dots in some intriguing conversations that too...

Moments ago, DOE Secretary Steven Chu did the expected, announcing the award of $620 million for projects around the country to demonstrate advanced Smart Grid technologies and integrated systems. Th...

My father once told me that there's no such thing as a sure bet. I had bet him my entire allowance for the week on something I was convinced was a sure thing. I lost. I haven't bet anyone anything,...

 
Toolbox
Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent EntriesRecent Entries
Recent CommentsRecent Comments

RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Sponsored Content

Copyright © 1996-2010 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.