A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

We like the vanadium redox flow battery from VRB Power Systems, Inc - so much in fact, that we asked to become a sales affiliate a couple of years ago.  This energy storage system offers multiple options for service and I suggest the following as a potential application.  This is the first installment of at least two posts. Your thoughts and comments are welcome.

Situation: Consider a semi-conductor industrial manufacturer with a nearly flat load of 7.5 MW 24/7.  This plant needs good power quality - a shut down due to a power quality event can cost $500,000 per hour in scrap and downtime.  To avoid curtailment and rolling blackouts during the California Energy Crisis of 2001, this plant invested $1.6 million to construct a pad and connections for 10 MW of mobile diesel generators.  Rental of the generators cost $400,000.

This plant also has a dedicated 33kV line to the utility substation to improve power quality and reliability.  In spite of all this, they still had a two hour outage in May due to a short circuit at the sub.

Solution:  A proposed solution to their problem is a 5MW VRB ESS (energy storage system) with 4 - 8 hours of storage (20 - 40 MWhrs) and advanced power conditioning system, located on the customer side of the utility meter.

UPS:  The ESS is warranted to over generate 50% for 10 minutes each hour, allowing it to provide full facility coverage (7.5 MW) to protect against transient power quality events.  In fact, the VRB-ESS is capable of providing a short-term power output of approximately 5 times nominal for periods of 1 minute in every hour (handy for large motor startups). The response time for this is virtually instantaneous of the order of 5 milliseconds. The PCS has to be rated accordingly.

Emergency Power:  With the storage in the system, the industrial customer has hours of power to ride through short-term curtailments and allow for orderly shut-down in case of a long term emergency. 

Why the VRB?:  One could argue that any large lead acid battery UPS or flywheel and diesel generator system could provide the same benefits - why the VRB?  Cost, life cycle, disposal, and environment are a few of the issues in favor of the VRB.

Cost:  I'll provide more information on this topic in my next post, but much of the cost of the system can be subsidized by selling energy services to the regional grid operator - the California Independent System Operator (CAISO).  This UPS can pay for itself!

Life Cycle:  Without going into technical detail, this system has a life of 25 years or more without degradation from repeated use.  This is a feature of flow battery technology.  More information on flow batteries in general can be found at Wickepedia.  The Wickpedia link to vanadium flow batteries is here... Life is extended by replacing the proton exchange membrane in the energy cell in years 12-15.  The electrolyte does not degrade or wear out.  In addition, the system needs very little maintenance and is designed to be monitored remotely.  By comparison, lead acid batteries and diesel gensets require extensive maintenance and on-site monitoring.

Disposal:  The electrolyte does not need to be replaced, so disposal is not an issue.  No lead, cadmium or other hazardous metals are involved.

Environment:  The system does not generate emissions, unlike a diesel generator - which has to be fired up every month for maintenance.  In fact, in the next post, we'll see how the ESS reduces emissions from grid connected power generators by 70%.  The ESS is a clean tech system - no disposal, no hazardous metals, and GHG emission reduction.

Next:  In the next post, I'll explain how the system can pay for itself, how it can be used to integrate renewable energy, why the utility likes it, and what some of the challenges are to installation. 

member photo I recently read an article about Britain deploying VRB systems. In the article, it was noted that the lack of vanadium would be a severe limiting factor. Has that been solved?
# Posted By Thomas Saidak | 8/21/08 9:40 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo The vanadium redox flow battery (or any flow battery) poses a possible solution to the time problem with charging automobile batteries. Instead of waiting hours for a charge or of swapping out whole batteries, could we simply pull up to a service station and drain the spent electrolyte and fill up with new electrolyte, paying for the difference in their electrolyte concentrations? With the right connectors, that might be done in about the time it takes to fill a gas tank. The service station could then recharge the dilute solution and, with some storage capacity, could even wait for off-peak rates to transfer the electric load. Since electricity is equivalent to about $0.50/gallon gasoline, shifting to off-peak rates might get it even lower. The concept reduces fossil fuel use, CO2 emissions, and dependence of foreign oil supplies, while throwing in elements of demand-side management. With the ability to match recharge cycles with power availability, it also offers flexibility to accommodate changes in the generating mix when solar and wind become more prevalent. If an area developed an excess daytime capacity of solar and wind, the service stations could shift back to daytime recharging.
# Posted By Michael Gembol | 8/25/08 8:19 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Regarding cost of vanadium, yes, it has peaked recently, as have all commodities. And, as with most commodities, when supply is constrained, leading to increased cost to meet demand, some enterprising fellow goes out and finds more! Current forecasts call for a drop in pricing in 2010-11 when new sources of supply come on-line. And, don't forget, the vanadium isn't consumed in the process.

Regarding mobile use for electrolyte, I think the idea is excellent, but the implementation is improbable. The problem is the infrastructure to support refueling. This is why natural gas, ethanol / methanol, hydrogen, and other alternative auto fuels aren't more widespread. I think large bulk storage is the best application now and we'll see about the future.
# Posted By Charles Toca | 8/27/08 1:03 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo I agree the supply outlook for vanadium prices going forward is positive. While they have recently been above historical levels, prices may moderate somewhat over the intermediate term.

The CPM's "Vanadium Industry, 2008 Outlook" (http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=4... thinks "prices are forecast to experience a rather steep decline in 2011 as the market transitions to a surplus, according to the detailed mine by mine breakdown in the report."

That may make the VRB-ESS battery even cheaper down the road as the vanadium is some 40% of the battery's cost.

Vanadium is typically found and produced as a by-product of other mining activity. Uranium is one such metal. Crosshair Exploration is a salient example that's been busy drilling up some 11 millions pounds of uranium on its Labrador acreage. In the process, they proved up 6.39 million pounds of V205 with another 7.83 million in the "inferred" catagory. And there are a lot of Canadian juniors currently scurrying the planet for new U308 deposits.

Given the renaissance in the uranium sector -- with its boom in uranium drilling -- we may see a lot more vanadium found...hopefully in politically secure areas like Canada.
# Posted By Kevin Cullen | 8/28/08 12:54 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox
Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent EntriesRecent Entries
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Copyright © 1996-2009 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.