A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

These days it seems like if you just blink the costs for coal-fired generation have gone up. I did some calculations for operating a coal-fired 350 MW unit, based on figures from a few of our customers. The results were startling: From January 2007 to January 2009 the cost of operating a typical 350 MW unit (without an SCR or FGD) will increase by more than 130 percent.

 

To calculate these costs, I used current $5.65/ton Chicago Climate Exchange (CCE) prices for CO2. The European Union market is currently trading above $20/ton and a US Federal market is predicted to be closer to the latter than the former, but it is always better to be conservative.
 
Keep in mind that the delta in NOx is not just a $2,000/ton market being layered on top of the existing seasonal market. The latter also functions for 12 months instead of five.
 
Similarly the spot market for eastern medium sulfur coal is currently way above $3.00/mmBtu, but unlike gas and oil (where world supplies peaked some years ago) I believe the huge supply of coal and dampening of recent currency fluctuation will ultimately push it back down toward the $3.00/ton we were seeing six months ago.  

I’m not hearing too much about this issue from the staff at the plant level, but I imagine that these costs are weighing heavily on the minds of upper management.

www.neuco.net

www.theoptimizationblog.com

member photo Ouch! And capital costs of new builds skyrocketing as well.
# Posted By Len Gould | 4/15/08 4:19 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Contrary to popular belief coal fired generation is no longer the low-cost option, and hasn't been for several years. Natural gas combined cycles still are the lowest cost source of new generation (I'm talking about total costs for a new plant, not operating costs for a fully depreciated plant), and wind is now #2. With capital costs over $2000/kw and coal at $3/mmbtu, coal plants simply are not competetive now.
# Posted By Don Kopecky | 4/16/08 6:16 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo I beieve , instead of belief we should go with real statastics. We cannot ignore operating cost. I mean to say fuel cost when comparing with coal.We must assess condition of availability of Oil/Natural gas compare to coal. If demand-supply difference increases beyond limit than nobody can cotroll it's price.The latest example of Oil price , we are observing. The same thing possible for Natural gas if we don't know how much quantity of gas is available compare to demand. For example, in this artical for Gas from Alaska, they predict availability in 2020 . So we cannot forecast it's availability upto 2020 as per our estimated price.While in case of Coal we know that it is abundantly available and so less chances to go higher price than we expect
# Posted By Mayur Bhatt | 4/18/08 8:02 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo This is a good, simple way to look at variable cost.

Regarding the abundance of coal - it is certainly true that we have quite a bit in the US. What most people fail to see though is that the extraction of coal, and then its delivery by train, are both very diesel-intensive processes. Not an expert in coal economics, but I'd wager that much more than half the price of coal is the cost of diesel fuel. Hence, when diesel cost goes up, so does the cost of coal.

Of all the distillates, the greatest global demand pressure is on diesel, due to its perceived greater efficiency as a motor fuel, and due to the ability to site diesel generators quickly in developing countries (and in countries expereincing rolling blackouts).

So the cost of coal might not be as volatile as natural gas and liquid fuels; but coal is not immune from the larger forces of energy economics. There is no more "cheap coal" as we used to know it. Nonetheless, coal-derived electricity will likely remain the lowest cost base-load option available long-term.
# Posted By Tom Tillman | 4/21/08 8:12 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox
Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Copyright © 1996-2008 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.