Posted At : August 10, 2010 8:00 AM
| Posted By : Tony Giroti
Related Categories:
Asset Management,
Billing & Bill Payment,
Business & Corporate,
Carbon Markets,
Clean Power Investing,
Communications & Security,
Demand Management,
Demand Response,
Distributed Generation,
Distribution Management Systems,
Electric Vehicles,
Energy Efficiency,
Energy Storage,
General,
GIS,
Grid Operations,
Grid Security,
Human Resources,
Industry Structure,
Information Technology,
Metering,
Mobile Workforce Management,
Outage Management,
Overhead Transmission,
Policy, Regulatory & Legal,
Risk & Operations,
SCADA,
Substations,
T&D Asset Management,
T&D Automation,
Underground T&D
We know of many Smart Grid projects that are not doing well. One wonders why. Although there are many reasons why that is the case, one thing is certain -- without a strategic IT architecture there is little hope. IT and Power Systems Engineering applications have typically operated in silos due to the lack of any compelling need for integration – integration between business units, integration between business processes, integration between applications, and even integration of databases. Up until now, the industry has had minimal real-time integration capabilities built into IT systems because applications and data integration needs have been met tactically through a one-off and project-based approach. IT has never had the motivation, the business drivers or the budget to develop a strategic architecture or develop a standardized approach to integration. Application and Data integration requirements have been met through a tactical approach based upon any available technology or middleware offered by the application or system vendor. Available resources have had to develop quick point-to-point interfaces between applications to achieve near-term objectives. Each interface is non-standard and custom-coded. Many of these interfaces are batch rather than real-time, with database links and proprietary code that is customized by writing more code within the application. A point-to-point integration approach is not scalable, precludes future upgrades, and increases risk to the organization, as any change to the application would have a Ripple Effect on other downstream applications. Although the custom interface meets short-term needs, it stifles future growth and scalability. The integration gap keeps widening over time with custom code written for each P2P interface. The viral impact of the point-to-point architecture continues to reduce the overall integration capability, making each change riskier than the one prior. Data continues to be locked in silos and sharing becomes a significant challenge over time. This growth over the years has resulted in what we refer to as an "Accidental Architecture”.
Successfully tackling these IT challenges will enable organizations to clearly execute on their vision of Smart Grid. Utilities should be developing a Real-Time Integration Architecture that will serve as a foundation for all SG & DR programs.
|
|
| Toolbox |
|
Feb 09, 2012 - 2012-01-01 11:00:00
Feb 29, 2012 - 2011-01-01 12:00:00
Feb 06, 2012 - 2012-01-01 00:00:00
Feb 16, 2012 - 2012-01-01 12:00:00
Feb 15, 2012 - Feb 16, 2012
Feb 08, 2012 - Feb 10, 2012
Feb 06, 2012 - Feb 09, 2012
|
|
There are no comments for this entry.