A Service of Energy CentralEnergyBlogs.com Logo

Reducing generation at times of transmission constraints would significantly reduce the capital required for transmission upgrades required. I suggest that developers must examine this in detail using Network Study and Optimization tools, before deciding on a siting.

 

It must be appreciated that in this particular case the reduction has been from 60Million to 11 Million dollars.

However the question remains as to who should pay for transmission upgrades required to accommodate the new generation planned from Renewable Energy.

 Requiring the wind developers to pay for at least 25 to 75 percent of upgrade costs is beneficial because it creates an incentive for developers to consider economic efficiencies when they choose locations for their wind farms. That reduces the potential for the shifting of costs from the developers to the customers, which could occur if no upgrade costs were assessed against developers.

 All ratepayers, not just developers, would benefit from the upgrades and should help pay for them. Further, requiring developers to pay for the upgrades would threaten the economic viability of his projects and stifle further development of renewable energy in the country.

member photo Dear Mr. Banerji,

In response to your article, I have written the article "Financing and Developing Wind Projects," in the Electricity Without Price Controls (EWPC) Blog, here in Energy Central Network.

Under EWPC, any upgrades to the transportation (transmission and distribution) system are to be done with a long run integral perspective to guarantee maximum social welfare.
# Posted By Jose Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio | 10/5/07 4:02 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Just curious: Are you blogging anywhere else? Maybe on a corporate website. Please let me know. I'm working on understanding how people in the energy sector use blogs. See my blogs here on http://www.energyblogs.com/g3publicrelations/index... and here on www.pr-me.blogspot.com. I'd like to include your response in some stories I write. Effectively, why are are blogging these days? What do you hope to achieve?
best, Joey Gimenez
joeygimenez@gmail.com
# Posted By Joey Gimenez | 10/9/07 8:17 PM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo It is a wonderful opportunity to share the thoughts and ideas through the blogs.
Just some time ago I was reading about "spark spread"and the concept to my surprise was
quite new to many power professionals Italked to subsequently.Therefore I thought to start a discussion on "spark spread"and the related concepts in energy trading by the following definition...members are requested to add and give their valuable comments so that
we can in three months time have a small book prepared for the power professional.

Spark Spread - The spark spread reflects the costs or anticipated costs of producing power from a specific facility. It can be used as a method of converting millions of Btus to megawatt hours and vice versa, and thus relates well to the electricity and natural gas futures contracts. The spread is simply the heat rate (a proxy for efficiency) of a specific generating unit or power system (the number of Btus needed to make one kilowatt hour of electricity), multiplied by the cost of energy expressed as dollars per British thermal units (Btus). For example, if it takes 10,000 Btus to make one kilowatt hour of electricity, the formula can be simplified by multiplying the price per million Btus (MMBtu) by 10 to equate one MMBtu of natural gas to one megawatt hour (Mwh) of electricity. The usefulness of the spread evaluation is dependent on the market price for power which reflects the relationship of the supply and demand for power, not the efficiencies of the generating units. Other costs affecting the price of power using the spark spread evaluation include those of gas transportation, power transmission, plant operations and maintenance, and fixed costs. Because the electricity futures contract is specified in lots of 736 megawatt hours, and the natural gas futures contracts are specified in units of 10,000 million Btus, one power contract equates to 0.736 natural gas contracts.

The term dark spread refers to the similarly defined difference between cash streams (spread) for coal-fired power plants. These indicators of power plant economics are useful for tracing energy markets. For operating or investment decisions published "spread" data are not applicable. Local market conditions, actual plant efficiencies and other plant costs have to be considered.Further definition of clean spread indicators include the price of carbon dioxide emission allowances.

For the formula oriented readers:
Spark Spread = Cost of Electricity - [ (Cost of Gas) * (Heat Rate) ] = $/Mwh - [ ($/MMBtu) * (MMBtu / Mwh) ]
Both prices in the above formula must be in the same currency and must refer to the same energy unit (usually MWh).
# Posted By HIMADRI BANERJI | 6/12/08 6:49 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
member photo Recommendations on connectivity of wind energy generators to transmission grids.The following facilities are an absolute must as per the National Grid Operator in its recommendation to the Central Regulatory Commission.But the question remains who will pay for all these??
--Soft start and stopping of generation - Soft start and stopping of generators can be ensured so that sudden injection/withdrawal at wind mills can be avoided.
--Frequency response of generators - Wind mills can function on the free governor mode of operation (FGMO) basis keeping in mind that present day wind generators can vary generation in response to change in frequency.
--Withstanding transient line fault - Wind generators should withstand the voltage dip caused during the transient fault clearance time so that the generator continues to generate once the fault is cleared.
--Short term estimation of wind generation - It is a must to have short term prediction of the wind generation so that some advance planning can be done.
# Posted By HIMADRI BANERJI | 7/1/08 4:59 AM | Report This Comment as Foul/Inappropriate
 
Toolbox
Blog Editor
Search
Calendar
Recent EntriesRecent Entries
Recent CommentsRecent Comments
RSS
Energy Central
Power Network


Copyright © 1996-2008 by CyberTech, Inc. All rights reserved.
Energy Central ® is a registered trademark of CyberTech, Incorporated.
CyberTech does not warrant that the information or services of Energy Central will meet any specific requirements; nor will it be error free or uninterrupted; nor shall CyberTech be liable for any indirect, incidental or consequential damages (including lost data, information or profits) sustained or incurred in connection with the use of, operation of, or inability to use Energy Central.
2821 S. Parker Rd. Ste 1105 Aurora, CO 80014
Contact: Phone - 303-782-5510 Fax - 303-782-5331 or service@energycentral.com.